Article: Response to “Mere Theistic Evolution”
This article is William Lane Craig’s response to the ideas presented in the book “Theistic Evolution”. Dr. Craig walks through four potential theological objections to theistic evolution, and how the book responds to those objections.
While I think that it is true that nonphysical souls fit much better within a theistic worldview than within a naturalistic worldview,
William Lane Craig
I see no reason to think that the theist cannot maintain that at some point in hominid evolution, once the brain had sufficiently evolved, God created a soul and incarnated it in a hominin
he had prepared to become the first human being.
You must be logged in to post a comment.