William Lane Craig

Debate: Calvinism vs Molinism (Craig V. White)

Yowzers! This is like the Rumble in the Jungle! Two tremendous Christian thinkers and debaters going head-to-head! William Lane Craig versus James White? Unbelievable? BELIEVE IT! Take in this debate that circles around the problem of evil.

Unbelievable?: Calvinism and Molinism are two very different ways of understanding God’s sovereignty. But which one best addresses the problem of evil? James White argues that Calvinism – God foreordaining all human behaviour both good and evil – is the more Biblical and coherent view. William (Bill) Lane Craig argues that Molinism – a view which reconciles human freedom and divine sovereignty – is Biblically consistent without making God the author of evil.

For James White: https://www.aomin.org

For Bill Craig: https://www.reasonablefaith.org

For the 2013 Bill Craig & Paul Helm dialogue on Calvinism & Molinism: https://bit.ly/3o550G0

Type at least 1 character to search
Catch the AP315 Team Online:

The mission of Apologetics 315 is to provide educational resources for the defense of the Christian faith, with the goal of strengthening the faith of believers and engaging the questions and challenges of other worldviews.

Defenders Media provides media solutions to an alliance of evangelistic ministries that defend the Christian worldview. We do this by elevating the quality of our members’ branding to match the excellence of the content being delivered.