Monday, July 13, 2009Greg Bahnsen on Van Tilian Apologetics MP3 AudioIn light of the release of Greg Bahnsen‘s “lost” book Presuppositional Apologetics: Stated & Defended, here is some supplemental audio on Bahnsen’s presentation of Van Tilian apologetics: • Van Tilian Apologetics, I – 77:11• Van Tilian Apologetics, II – 64:57• Van Tilian Apologetics, III – 74:46• Van Tilian Apologetics, IV – 55:41 (original audio found at WTS Resources) Listen to an interview about the book here. Enjoy. Apologetics315 is a non-profit ministry. You can support this work here. Do you do your shopping at Amazon? If so, using this Amazon link supports Apologetics315. In the UK? Use this UK Amazon link. By Brian Auten on July 13, 2009 at 6:30 am Topics: apologetics, audio, Greg Bahnsen, mp3, presuppositional apologetics, Van Til 6 comments 0 Related Is God Active in the World Today? Gary Habermas Interview MP3 Audio Sunday Quote: Antony Flew on the Resurrection 6 Comments dvd July 13, 2009 I am not a big fan of that type of apologetic. I don't think it stands up to hardcore philoshopical analysis. Perhaps there is some "middle ground?" Athiests who question the argument are correct. I think what Habermas, Montgomery, Craig have used in terms of evidence is the correct approach. Brian July 13, 2009 dvd, I am sure you are not alone in that opinion. However, I find it valuable to be as informed as possible on the various schools of apologetics. Mike-e July 15, 2009 Thanks for posting this Brian. I'm very excited about Bahnsen's new book and also for the audio you posted. dvd, keep in mind that presuppositionalists do use evidences in their approach. Just as an example, take a look at James White's debate with Dan Barker. Furthermore, the TAG argument can be considered an evidence right along with the cosmological, teleological, and others. I think good use can be make of all the various approaches and evidences. mennoknight August 20, 2009 Ironically, I don't think most "hardcore philoshopical analysis" stands up to "hardcore Biblical analysis". In attempting to work from a biblically informed worldview (and a biblical metaphysic and epistemology), I find myself rejecting a fair amount of "Christian" apologetics myself, but that is not to say that I don't find the evidence for the truthfulness of God and his self revelation in the Bible overwhelming in any area of skepticism. I like much of what Habermas, Lane Craig, Moreland, White, McDowell, Wallace, Bock, Strobel, etc. have to say about things. But when apologetics meets evangelism, no single fact from any discipline, nor no collection of facts regardless of their size or scope, is ultimately able to move the sin-affected mind from a position of unbelief to belief. Anonymous October 17, 2012 ^nor is it intended too. apologetics defend Christianity. the gospel moves the sinner's heart. J.Karl September 22, 2016 Presuppositional apologetics is a method of defending the Christian faith by addressing the issue of worldviews and what comports with reality, ethics, knowledge and a few other things.